A few of you might be a little suspicious about my being in upper sixth, saying I’ve applied to university, and saying nothing else of it. That changes today. The reason was that I was a little paranoid about universities finding this blog, and consequently seeing my other choices and any opinions I have about them. I now have four replies, and I expect to hear from the fifth by February, so I’m tired of waiting and secrecy.

Here you go (Track order):
University of Warwick:
Physics
Offer: AAA
University of Bristol:
Maths
Awaiting reply.
Durham University:
Natural Sciences
Rejected like a fool.
University of Manchester:
Physics
Offer: A*AA
University of Cambridge:
Natural Sciences
Off— Joking! Rejection.

Three different courses? Yep. I mentioned a good while ago about my inability to decide on my future, so I didn’t really decide in the end. My choices were sort of rushed because of the early Oxbridge deadline. The personal statement was a job to do for this, and as you can see it’s had a mixed success rate.

I’m pleased with my two offers, both for physics. At this present point in time I can’t choose between the two if I have to. I actually had an interview for Cambridge (or three to be precise). Evidently I failed them, and had that infinitesimal unit of hope blown away from my eyes. I accepted this fate long before the letter so the news wasn’t that bad. Durham rejected me soon after, so I’m not even good enough to be a Cambridge reject. However, I wasn’t too bothered about Durham either, I regretted applying there for several reasons (as said, the choices were rushed) and so would not have gone. Still, it’s a good blow to how you evaluate your academic character (especially when you thought you’d get an offer there).

Bristol is still waiting, as you can see. I wanted a maths choice because I like the prospect of a maths degree even if the gods are directing me to physics. I don’t expect an offer due to its competition and my circumstances, but if I did get one I’d definitely investigate, visit, and contemplate my three possible futures.

I must say one thing about rejections. I don’t know about you, but I cannot stand the phrase ‘we regret to inform you’ or something along those lines. It’s a trivial point to get angry about, but Jesus, it’s technically incorrect.

I’ll keep you updated by putting my Track record on the sidebar, and I’ll likely throw a post when I make my decision, ’cause, y’know, it’s just my future.
 
 
I have school tomorrow. I don’t know for how long, what I’m doing, and if I’m at school on Friday. However, September has started, so summer is pretty much dead (though I didn’t see any signs of life in terms of weather).

Let’s review that list from the post I made for the summer when I left:
1. Decide on a course for university (at least get somewhere, please).
I’m very disappointed at this one, it was almost fundamental. I did get more informed, but I’m still unsure. I just better decide pretty soon.
2. Have an idea of where to study.
This depends on what I want to do, but I am likely to apply to Cambridge (applying alone doesn’t deserve praise).
3. Have a few driving lessons.
Yes! Something completed! I did five, I’m gradually improving.
4. Either start learning an instrument or at least progress on the piano/keyboard.
Psh.
5. Substantially increase my iTunes library.
Yeah, I posted about it here.
6. Learn how to cook something other than toast.
Haha, get out of here.
7. Learn C++ (programming).
Nope, but I’m learning C. C is related but is (as far as I know) easier to learn for noobs.
8. Learn some Japanese or give up any English-Japanese bilingual dreams.
A bit, I can read the kana (though that isn’t much of an achievement) and a program I co-wrote today is actually a nouns test. The grammar book I bought from Amazon arrived today.
9. Make comics to prepare for September (then realise that they’re terrible and burn them).
I’ve got c. 20 drafts, I’ll probably make A4s and scan them if I actually post them. Burning is still a probability.
10. Complete at least three things off the 100 things list.
I did 1, I got an A at AS.
11. Read some books.
I finished SuperFreakonomics, and I’m reading a couple of other books at the moment, but I haven’t finished them.
12. Read some revision guides (i.e. get ahead).
I’m read a little, and did a chapter and a bit off FP1 (further maths).
13. Draw more.
I drew myself.
14. Become more knowledgeable in general.
I’m probably a bit more knowledgeable, but nothing to brag about.

So I did some stuff. Not too bad, I’m just annoyed that I still haven’t decided on what to study at university.
 
 
Like most, I like music. Like most, the amount of compatible music for me is finite. A year ago today I discovered, or perhaps rediscovered, The Beatles. I remember browsing YouTube that on that August 26th day and stumbling into She Loves You. In instantly recognising the 1963 classic I dived into many more and gathered before too long that many, many songs from the back of my head were by the band.

Their influence put up a good fight to monopolise my iTunes library, and they didn’t do too bad, they even made my favourite song. I have exactly 300 songs (a humble count in the eyes of many), with exactly one third from The Beatles. My interest in them leaked into discovering the music from the minds of many others from their day, shaping my now definable music taste. As today has brought together a few milestones, I feel like honouring a post to this, i.e. my library of music.

Here are some data (there’s some colour for the geographers):
Proportion of songs by artist (minimum 5 songs to be included):
Picture
The huge contribution from The Beatles does make this look like a ’60s peace symbol. Relating from that, I think it’s best to tell you now that I am most definitely not a hippie, and in fact would heavily fund efforts to destroy their existence once and for all. I’m not the only one. You can see the other bands and musicians from their day making an impact, and simply unrelated ones like Weird Al. The big chunk to the left contains artists with less than five songs (as said), as otherwise the chart would be less readable than my handwriting (Arabic). It’s important to point out that a major reason for The Beatles’ presence is because of the very, very large discography (so there were inevitably many songs for me to ‘buy’).

Proportion of songs by year:

Picture
There’s not much from the ’40s and ’50s; personally, I think the only really good song from then was Chuck Berry’s Johnny B. Goode (1958). The early ’60s sort of sucked in my opinion as well, Bobby Pickett’s Monster Mash (1962) was a good anomaly. The mid-to-late ’60s was, as I am overly conveying, the heyday. The ’70s weren’t bad, nor were the ’80s, but I’ve yet to explore them as I believe I am unqualified to assert that they lack a lot of what I like. As for the 1990s and 2000s, screw ’em. Same for 2010. Musical ignorance is bliss.

Top ten songs by play count:

Help! (The Beatles)
264 plays.
Lux Aeterna (Clint Mansell)
260 plays.
Yesterday (The Beatles)
258 plays.
Still Alive (Portal)
225 plays.
Let It Be (The Beatles)
200 plays.
Octopus’ Garden (The Beatles)
195 plays.
Eleanor Rigby (The Beatles)
188 plays.
With a Little Help from My Friends (The Beatles)
183 plays.
I Feel Fine (The Beatles)
182 plays.
Revolution (The Beatles)
181 plays.

Note that I think that this is a rather unreliable measure of affection, I tend to switch song the second before it finishes as I’m impatient to wait during the brief pause (some songs have very long end pauses, like A Day in the Life. Certain songs I’ve had a lot longer than others, and I might just prefer listening to a live version.


Final article of trivia: exactly (but only) 1% of my library are songs singed by women.

I hope this post has done…something. But fuck it, it’s my blog, I guess I can write about things that only concern me and are of no benefit to others. Sexist TomRed out.

 
 
It’s that time of the biannual cycle again, so here’s my AS results:
Maths: A
284 UMS ≈ 95%
Physics: A
288 UMS ≈ 96%
Chemistry: A
289 UMS ≈ 96%
Economics B
155 UMS ≈ 78%
Philosophy & ethics: B
156 UMS ≈ 78%
(Individual module marks for the June season will be at the bottom, after the ‘read more’ break)

So what do I think of it? When I opened them I wasn’t really happy, because I was hoping for five As (because I’m a cocky bastard). That was like an hour ago, and now I’m not too bothered, pretty happy that the As are in the proper subjects (there, I said it). I might retake economics 2 and/or ethics, but it will be a tedious process, rendering me having to do ethics for a third time and never being free from economics in my school life.

These results were all a matter of pride for me, as these results are good nonetheless, however, I am a bit worried about any Oxbridge application or applying to other high profile unis, but I’m not counting on getting in to Oxbridge anyway. In summary: to save myself from being a whiny prick, I’m alright with these, it’s just the shock of diminished bragging rights. I hope those reading this that are on the same boat did well, and are not hating me for complaining if I beat them.
 
 
School’s out. Yep, for five weeks or so (less than half of last year’s summer) I am out of that institution that blocks my site every now and then because it prioritises blocking out swear words (does the title count?) over allowing teachers to capitalise on my A-level stuff section (which has actually happened once or twice). Sports week was not something I despised but the fact that it was the reason why my school was among the few to keep us in this late angers me, especially when I made up about a thirtieth of the sixth form (or all of the sixth form in the first ten minutes from when I arrived).

Apart from complaining about the mildly flawed leaving system, this post has some sort of purpose, as I have not made a record of targets for this summer. This summer is somewhat important – it bridges the two years of A-level, it is needed for me to decide on what to do at uni (besides heavily subsidise the alcohol industry), I want to learn how to drive (except not GTA style), and I want to do other productive things, like stuff from my 100 things list. To formalise this, I’ve put a list so I will know what to do and will lash myself if I fail to achieve it. You can stick around for the below if you’re a stalker, knock your brains out:
1. Decide on a course for university (at least get somewhere, please).
2. Have an idea of where to study.
3. Have a few driving lessons.
4. Either start learning an instrument or at least progress on the piano/keyboard.
5. Substantially increase my iTunes library.
6. Learn how to cook something other than toast.
7. Learn C++ (programming).
8. Learn some Japanese or give up any English-Japanese bilingual dreams.
9. Make comics to prepare for September (then realise that they’re terrible and burn them).
10. Complete at least three things off the 100 things list.
11. Read some books.
12. Read some revision guides (i.e. get ahead).
13. Draw more.
14. Become more knowledgeable in general.

That’s all from my head, if I think of more I’ll add them. I’ll also make ’em bold if I complete them. I believe I made some sort of list like this last year, hah, like I did a single thing.
 
 
I had one lesson today, of which seven people turned up for. In post-exam sixth form that is actually pretty good. I barely remember any chemistry lessons, I was either a quarter of the physics pupils or half the physics teachers, and maths and economics were slightly more disciplined. I was unmotivated to work, and suspiciously didn’t turn up some of the time (I got a letter and a fancy pen rewarding me for 100% attendance today, as ironically I wasn’t in on the day they announced it).

Next week is Sports Week, my first in two years. I don’t like it as (contrary to my attendance record) I am terribly unhealthy, and in monopolising last place I’m thankful that there’s not really natural selection in modern humans. The good thing is that the days are shorter and there’s little thinking involved. On Friday I am free as a bird, having about half the summer holidays I did last year, but hopefully they will be twice as fulfilled.

By the way, I’ve finally started further maths, but additionally and self-taught. Place your bets, I reckon I’ll last a week.
 
 
Well, I’ve sold out. I look at my convenient view graph and as today looks bleak in terms of keeping my views above 100 visitors a day, I think it’s time to make a much needed post and spam anyone who has a computer.

For those of you who don’t know, my music taste is unusual for a person of my age. In other words, it’s actually good (the subjectivity alarm has been pressed). It’s predominantly 1960s and decreases in the neighbouring decades. It’s not to be rebellious (or to be rebellious by not being rebellious like every other teenager, that probably doesn’t make sense) as I genuinely like (most) of my songs, mainly because a certain radio station played many of the hits in my youth. The Beatles is obviously a liked band of mine, my favourite even. As you may have guessed, my favourite song is a Beatle song. Now, what might this be? Ringo, drum roll please…

Real Love, that’s the one. As you may have noticed, it was featured in a weekly video in the form of a fake live concert, here. It’s an excellent song by an excellent band, but it might not have made the cut without the background to the song.

It’s a mid ’90s song, which is around thirty years ahead of The Beatles’ writing period. John was shot and killed back in 1980, leaving Paul, Ringo, and George several years before he got cancer. Yoko Ono gave them a couple of John’s old demos that were not released, being Free as a Bird and Real Love, clearly the latter I prefer. Both were evidently put into hits by the remaining three. A shit load of editing for the many takes of Real Love and Real Life were combined to produce a good quality version of the song, and the others put in their vocal and instrumental contributions.

Watching the mock concert, it felt like I was on one of the drugs they took in the later part of their band career, like there was a unity even though John was dead, and it was due to the song itself. Finally, there is a connection to my Get a life… post (you don’t need to read that shit), as the song was the end of the line of Beatles songs and was in my lifeline.

Oh, by the way, this song was not played by BBC Radio 1 as they did not think it was a modern song despite being a new release. Although I can see their point, it was a futile defence as the average buyer of the song was a teenager and the average age of a Radio 1 listener is 33 (when they aim for viewers to be much younger). Consequently, when I come into power, Radio 1 will be replaced by Party propaganda.
Picture
Anthology 2 cover.
 
 
I was out one time and passed my primary school, a lot of it is guarded by a massive wall taller than my >6ft self. Whenever I pass it I make a brief jump to see it as it sometimes gives me a rush of previously locked memories. I like having memories of experiences of me from the 1990s, because they were experiences of me in the previous millennium. That time I discovered something blatantly obvious, the distinction between this and the last millennium is an arbitrary line from the Gregorian calendar. I already knew this, but acted in a way that the two millennia were distinct and separate from each other as I never registered it being arbitrary.

There are more examples of me thinking like this, for example, there are only two (verified) males alive from the nineteenth century. I get frustrated at my peers for not swallowing the significance of this, but again, it’s arbitrary. Finally, for some odd reason I find 80 and above a good age to live to and 79 and below a bad age to live to (funnily enough I probably won’t even live to 80).

One other age/time/life thing I am weirdly interested in is something that’s not arbitrary. Take someone I admire, like Carl Sagan. He died in 1996 and I was born in 1993. I was three when he died, and for me I would be disappointed if he died in, say, 1992. The fact that we crossed paths, the fact that I was alive at a point he was alive (even though any influence I had on his life was negligible), I just like. The same goes for one of my great-grandfathers (my mother’s mother’s father). He died when I was about 7 months old, but when I found out that when I was born he was still alive, many years ago, I was pleased.

Where am I going? Not far, it’s just some (creepy) way of thinking, but if you’re into the potentially mildly interesting, I can put these thoughts graphically, into what I’m gonna call lifeline graphs.

Let’s take a hypothetical person, this person was born in the start of 1920 and died in the start of 2005, aged 85. This person, as us all, grew in cognition from the beginning of his existence for some years in the growing up phase and in his old age developed dementia where his cognition depleted until his death. For the sake of simplicity, let’s take the beginning of existence at birth (even though there’s some limited cognitive development in the fetal stage (I think), but a birthday is a lot easier to trace) and a gradual change of cognition from birth to 10 years old, even though it would actually be more fluid than this. For this hypothetical man (not James Doohan), dementia was developed at the beginning of 2000. From this, one can represent his existence graphically:
Picture
So you can easily see how his existence was at any point on the time axis, even though there is a fine line between life and death, though it is useful to see their cognitive ability (my point is that a vegetable is quite different from a person in their prime, but if you have cancer you’re still the same in mind).

But to summarise the ideas I brought above, and more, let’s throw in several of some real people (including myself) into one lifeline graph:
Picture
The time axis clearly shows when people lived, but just looking at the lifelines themselves brings certain points:
1. You can see when people were alive together, The Beatles were all alive together, in their prime. I was alive with my great-granddad and Carl Sagan in my babyhood.
2. Consequently, you can see when people were dead together. This doesn’t just mean any time after two or more people have died, like in 2005 for John, George and Ronald Reagan, but also in 1985 when John and I were dead (in other words, we were ‘on the same level’), even though some get angry at me for thinking of ‘death’ as simply not being alive, meaning any children of mine would get squandered out of this definition (as they are not alive, but not dead by the definitions of most). Nevertheless, if my children were put in the graph, you could see that at the time of writing both my children and my great-granddad were dead.
3. You can see where one’s life has been encompassed in another’s. John Lennon’s life has been encompassed by Carl Sagan’s, who in turn has been encompassed by Ronald Reagan’s, who’s been encompassed by Walter Breuning’s.
4. If many peoples’ lifelines were listed, you could see chains that never break, i.e. a no points where no one in the chain is alive.

Anyway, the point of this really, really long post was just a few thoughts and a somewhat useful invention of mine (unless some fucker made it first).

Finally, if you didn’t recognise the names of any of the notable people, here you go:
Carl Sagan (1934–1996) – American astronomer, died from a difficult battle with myelodysplasia.
Ronald Reagan (1911–2004) – 40th president of the USA, suffered with Alzheimer’s disease for the last ten years of his life (hence the fading lifeline).
John Lennon (1940–1980) – member of The Beatles, shot and killed.
Paul McCartney (1942–) – member of The Beatles.
George Harrison (1943–2001)– member of The Beatles, died from cancer.
Ringo Starr (1940–) – member of The Beatles.
Walter Breuning (1896–) – world’s oldest living man.
 
 
Football and me go together like cutlery and nappies, i.e. we don’t go together. Sure, I’m a male, I’m allegedly programmed to like it, but that’s not the point. I suppose I can understand the competition and all, but to watch men kick a ball around for ninety minutes, with a couple of short ecstasies and angers, bores me. The World Cup interests me mildly, as it’s nations as opposed to clubs, macro as opposed to the micro. As Ireland rarely gets in due to unfortunate circumstances like the genesis of the French, I would half-support a team overall but would focus on supporting a team in individual matches, but I’m unlikely to watch the whole thing.

This one, however, is different. It’s got me a job. If England can sustain itself (and hopefully execute its defence flaws) then I may keep this job for a couple of weeks and earn a few bob picking up glasses (more money to add to the useless pile).

I have high hopes for the DPRK tonight, and one day, just one day, would like to see Vatican City qualify.
Picture
Damn locusts! (Thanks, John)
 
 
My exams have finished, I am a free man. Of course, it is only a temporary blip in the work demands of sixth form and it’s a mere 7 months to my next batch.

First of all, I’ve realised what I had predicted had come true, i.e. the fact that my site visitors have peaked this month (and the last) with several hundred a day being the norm. As there are not as many in my year utilising my A-level stuff to explaining the magnitude of the increase, I actually thought that maybe, just maybe, people are actually reading this shit I type. Alas, I was informed that neighbouring schools have heard of my stash of past papers and mark schemes and pupils downloaded until the rum was gone without giving this poor, malnourished blog a glimpse. How do I know this? Because as the exams are done my views are contracting back to their humble state. Though to be fair, I have had a bit of feedback, so I’ll leave it at that.

In regards to my blog, as I have no pressure on revision or any of that nonsense, I can actually post about stuff not academically related in any way or form. For a little preview of future events, I intend to make comics.



Laughter over? Yes, that’s right. Beethoven became deaf, so maybe I can make comics from September. I’m talking about generic Monday-Wednesday-Friday comics with a few bits of gold clattered around rubbish. I say September as I am in the process of drawing drafts, and I would like to make a sufficient amount of them before I start uploading.

Oh, the exams. Erm… I’m not sure how I did, especially with my predictions generally being wrong, all could have been worse (I hesitate to say that for mechanics and economics) and all could have been better, but August will tell.
 

Create a free website with Weebly